Wednesday Jun 19

Posts Tagged ‘Television Programming’

May
05/13
Saving The American Soap Opera
Last Updated on Thursday, 9 May 2013 10:24
Written by ModernMediaMix
Sunday, May 5th, 2013

The good old soap opera.  It has been a pastime for your mothers and grandmothers.  If you were anything like me, you were sitting right there at the kitchen table, at the tender age of 9, mystified by the Luke and Laura story.  Those were the days!  But over the years all of the greats have slowly faded away.  “Guiding Light” was cancelled in 2009, “One Life To Live” was cancelled in 2012, “Passions” was cancelled in 2007, “Another World” was cancelled in 1999, and “All My Children” was cancelled in 2011.  What happened…and where did we go wrong?

blog2  blog3  blog4

Why have soaps only been able to draw in a fraction of the audience they once did?  For starters, more women are going to work now.  They are no longer stay-at-home moms and homemakers.  In some cases they are the breadwinner for the household, and must put their career as a priority.

Cable is a threat.  It offers a variety of viewing options, and consumer’s choices are endless with the DVR, DVD, the Internet, video games all at their fingertips.  Soap opera ratings have consistently declined since the 1970’s, and now soaps are considered a genre of the past.  Fans are falling out of love with the storylines.  These shows are personal to viewers, and once your favorite show is killed off—like a discarded character—who wants to put time and energy into another? It’s just like relationships—they take lots of time to build.

The focus for soaps has become narrower, and the target audience is now shifting to the young adult women.  Producers need a new approach aimed at the boomer audience.  They are too concerned with putting out quick fix content that will be sure to spark ratings, instead of taking their time to develop content made to last.  And let’s not forget about our fathers and sons.  They too should be considered and are an important part of the fan base that needs to be reached.

Ratings are the air that soap operas breathe and these days they’re not breathing much of them.  The Nielsen Ratings System is a setup for failure for daytime TV.  Daytime TV must be watched on the same day it aired to be counted for their ratings. Primetime TV however can be watched in a 7-day period to be counted.  This leaves a big chunk of uncounted viewers, including me.

The executive initiative also needs to change.  Studio executives are so concerned with ratings and money that they have lost concentration on what really matters – the story, the characters, and the development of a soap opera.  Sets were once live and made the viewer feel personally involved.  Now they resemble that of primetime TV shows.  The idea is that you have to spend money to make money, and execs have got to cut the quick gimmicks and get back to the basics.

blog1

But, don’t shed tears just yet.  There may be hope for our beloved soaps after all!  Prospect Park – The Online Network, has agreed to take on “All My Children” and “One Life To Live” via onlinenetwork.com. This new soap opera venture is highly dependent on the intensely loyal fan base.  The hope is that due to the success of Internet-enabled TVs and iPods, web soaps will exceed expectations.  New episodes will premiere this spring on Hulu, Hulu Plus, and iTunes.  Fans will be able to stream 30-minute episodes each weekday via their computers, connected TVs, mobile phones and tablets.  This service is currently free though Hulu.com and Hulu Plus subscriptions but it is not clear if iTunes will provide free version.

Yes, soaps may not be what they used to but every little effort toward keeping them afloat is a positive step and I for one am excited to see what the future holds for this veteran genre.

- Brandi Fields

Apr
12/13
What’s REAL About Reality Shows?
Last Updated on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 04:07
Written by ModernMediaMix
Friday, April 12th, 2013

They are dominating networks everywhere and viewers just can’t get enough.  From dating shows, talent competitions, and personal exposure, reality TV has definitely proven over the years that it is here to stay.  But, have reality shows gone too far, taking parody and satire to the extreme?  And more importantly, are we wrong for watching?

Reality shows continue to stay relevant because they provide an endless amount of questions such as: “Are we what we watch?” “Are these shows abusive?” and “Is it ok because it’s not us who are the ones looking crazy?” These shows allow viewers to escape the issues in their everyday lives such as the failure of the economy and problems within their own homes.  Viewers enjoy feeling better about their own lives watching others live destructively.  Reality shows let the viewer know that things are not so bad and that there is somebody who is always worse off.

blog2“The Best Funeral Ever” is one of TLC’s newest money-makers on their Sunday night lineup.  This show glorifies the home-going celebrations of the deceased by putting together themed funerals, such as baby back ribs BBQ shindig where an oversized grill serves as a casket.  It’s quite obvious why this show might raise a few eyebrows.  It has even been known to have carnival themed funerals where the ashes even ride the rides.  Other controversial shows are “Here Comes Honey Boo Boo,” “Teen Mom,” and a Viewer’s Choice favorite “Toddlers & Tiaras,” which routinely pulls in more than 1 million viewers.  In the summer 2010, “Toddlers & Tiaras” premiered with an audience of 1.2 million. During the 2011 season, “Teen Mom” reached their season high in January with 4 million viewers.  3 million of those were in MTV’s target demographic of 12-34 years old.

      blog1   blog3   blog4

TLC says when producing content for their network they are only interested in one thing, will people watch.  When people watch, ads are bought and shows stay on the air, simple as that.  The irony of all this is that the same executive producer of these over-the-top, non-educational programs is the same executive producer for “Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader?”  Hey, at least they covered all their bases.

The manipulation of these shows can be so deceiving that it can make the viewer questions their own values and beliefs.  The amount of heavy editing creates programs that are sometimes more artificial than the scripted primetime shows.  Here are the Five Biggest Lies that we are fed by our beloved reality shows courtesy of one critic.

  1. They have No Social Message – These people should be looked at as pure entertainers for our viewing pleasure and nothing more.  Women are constantly told ‘how to get a man’ (i.e. The Bachelor) and how to be submissive.  These shows play into the many social biases that surround us and we eat it right up.
  2. They Liberate People from stereotypes and bigotry – It’s like taking one step forward, only to move 3 steps back.  Fascinating drama and humor comes at a price and we watch it every day.
  3. They Dominate TV because viewers want them – What you probably don’t know is that many poorly rated reality shows only exist because they can cost 50-75% less than scripted programs and benefit from revenue streams such as product placement and endorsement deals.  They are merely filling airtime and money has been made long before shows reach our living rooms.
  4. Today’s audience is too sophisticated for manipulation by producers – Producers like to think that content is acceptable because the consumer “knows better”.  The term ‘frankenbiting’ is defined in media as stitching together bits of conversations over time to create scenes which may be partly or completely fabricated.  Pure deception at its finest.
  5. Critical thinking about reality shows means rejecting them – Let’s not be afraid to get educated!  We are human and need our daily dose of entertainment just as much as the next man and that is ok.  Knowing the facts and differentiating between fiction and non-fiction is key here and producers are preying on the weak.

Will I stop watching reality shows? Heck no! The fascination is undeniable however, they are not for everyone and what’s REAL must be understood.

- Brandi Fields

Mar
30/13
Defying the Odds and Crossing Platforms: Defiance Drops and Premieres
Last Updated on Monday, 8 April 2013 12:44
Written by ModernMediaMix
Saturday, March 30th, 2013

In a few days, the world of transmedia will change with the launch of Defiance from Trion Worlds and SyFy. Defiance will be launched in two mediums, the first being a MMO game launching on April 2, 2013 and the second, a television series for NBC-Univeral’s SyFy set to launch on April 15 in the US and Canada, and in Ireland, Germany, the UK, France, and Brazil immediately thereafter.

Defiance1

The story itself takes place thirty-five years in the future where aliens, known as Votans have traveled to earth to start a new life. War breaks out and we are in the aftermath. In the MMO, Players are enlisted as “Ark Hunters” by Karl Von Bach to travel to the San Francisco Bay Area to search for alien technology.

Defiance the television drama, however, has a different backdrop; it takes place in Saint Louis and focuses on the more political aspects of a new earth with the Votans. Nonetheless, the two will be integrated and complement each other as story lines will cross over, but each product will be able to stand alone.

This process was not a piece of cake; it took over five painstaking years to complete and $100 million to make. The television team had to commit to characters and design years before the first camera started to roll. The MMO had to be released concurrently on three systems, the PC, Xbox360, and PS3. This posed a problem because the latter two console systems have only 512MB of RAM and are dated compared to the average gaming PC.

Now that nightmare is over, however, and it is time for launch. NBCUniversal has said that Defiance will be its top priority this year and last, with integrating the show with SyFy’s Faceoff and NBC’s Grimm. For it’s part, Trion has said it will be placing all of its resources into the promotion of the game.

The game launch also has the retailers on board, offering unique exclusives for pre-orders. Dodge has also jumped on board to promote its Dodge Charger for the show and the Challenger for the game, as an exclusive pre-order item.

Lastly, season one will launch five DLC packs throughout the season for 9.99 each and Trion is offering the gamer a 20% discount if they purchase a season-pass that includes all five DLC’s and some in game exclusives.

Defiance is defying the odds and we will soon see if this expensive experiment pays off. This may become the future of interconnectivity.

- Chris Oliver

Mar
25/13
Washington Heights The New Era
Last Updated on Monday, 22 April 2013 09:36
Written by ModernMediaMix
Monday, March 25th, 2013

Networks like Bravo, MTV, and VH1 have all produced shows for viewers to relate to. The most recent series MTV has embarked on is a show about a group of friends in Washington Heights, New York, a prominent area for the Dominican community. The show was created to highlight these young individuals lives as they journey through life and pursue their dreams.

Blog5

The show is illustrated through the perspective of main cast members “JP.” Over the course of a few months cast members were embarking on life long dreams. Auditioning for acting gigs, baseball league tryouts, starting fashion lines, to name a few. But what’s a MTV series without drama? There were love triangles, friendships gone bad, and families broken. All of this dramatic material was tapped over the course of a few months.

With the season just ending, the mixed feedback from viewers may have left the cast and MTV a bit confused. Some viewers felt as though the cast members didn’t represent the Latin community well. For that matter, some even felt that they didn’t highlight the Dominican culture at all, which is where most of the cast member’s families hail from. They cast felt as though the show was never intended to be about their Latino background, but more about them as individuals of society trying to find a way out of the world they were so used to.

Weekly viewers would take to Twitter and post their opinions about the show. Using #OnTheRise to signify the show and have input on how they felt about certain things. Even with that, ratings were still at a projected low throughout the season. After sitting back and thinking, I realized in many ways some of the viewers who relate to the Latin community might have simply felt no connection to the cast members. The cast view themselves as Latin American, all 2nd generation Dominicans.

I personally hope the show gets the go-ahead for a 2nd season, as I’m interested to know where they end up, and who they end up with. The Washington Heights has started a new era of series and I’m sure as time goes on we’ll begin to see more niche “community” related TV shows aired on these major cable channels.

- Elizabeth Giwa

Mar
12/13
By the Numbers: Social Media, Black Women and “Scandal”
Last Updated on Monday, 8 April 2013 12:23
Written by ModernMediaMix
Tuesday, March 12th, 2013

ABC has struck platinum with “Scandal.” More than 9 million viewers tune in to the action-packed political thriller every week to follow the rollercoaster life of Olivia Pope, a high-powered crisis manager, and her team of code crackers, killers and broken souls. “Scandal” has led ABC to the top of the primetime pack on Thursdays where the network is No. 1 among young adults 18-to-29.

Scandal2

However, one of the under appreciated but crucial audience demographics driving “Scandal’s” success is women of color, particularly black American women. This legion of “gladiators” invades social media networks on Thursday nights theorizing about Olivia Pope’s shenanigans and predicting plot twists. Black American women between the ages of 18 and 29 have rallied behind “Scandal” and are dedicated to its longevity and ratings success. This dedication can be attributed to three specific reasons: the actress Kerry Washington, the complex cast of characters, and the engaging of audiences through social media.

Olivia Pope is a boss, literally and figuratively. The dynamic character, played by Kerry Washington, was inspired by real-life crisis negotiator Julie Smith. She was brought to life by Shonda Rhimes, creator of “Grey’s Anatomy” and “Private Practice.” Three black American women in the creator, producer, inspiration and lead actress spots on a hit network television show grabbed black women’s attention immediately. Washington’s turn on “Scandal” is a historic. It is the first time a black woman has led a primetime network drama in more than three decades and the first time we’ve been offered such a dynamic character.

Washington’s Pope character is not only in charge of a team of negotiators, she is also a willing mistress to Tony Goldwyn’s President Fitzgerald Grant. Their complicated, interracial romance is far removed from the Clair Huxtable-perfectionist or the Beulah-mammy days of our television past. “She’s human. The great thing about her is that she’s not perfect. She’s not this magical character who walks into a room and fixes everything all the time, including her own life,” Washington told USA Today.

Scandal1

Historically, black women were portrayed in broadcast television in four roles: the Hypersexual Jezebel, the Welfare Queen, the Stressed Mother balancing-it-all, or the Nurturing Mammy. All of these stereotypes cast black women as a community in need of fixing. Pope subverts these paradigms by fixing the lives of influential figures while also dealing with her internal conflicts. It’s refreshing to see such a depiction of black as complex, but beautiful, chic and in control.

Washington’s Pope isn’t the only role capturing and engaging black women. There’s also Harrison (Columbus Short), a gorgeous computer hacker turned gladiator that often uses his charm as a tool of persuasion. His dedication to Pope is admirable, but also displays a loyalty between a black man and black woman that’s often neglected in television representations of black relationships and platonic friendships. Another character that appeals to black women is Huck (Guillermo Diaz), a former CIA-assassin that’s integral to the reputation of Pope’s crisis-management firm. His killer instinct paradoxes his humanity causing continual moments of consciousness that resonate with black women viewers. Both Short and Diaz are minorities as well.

Though character development and complex representations of communities of color have been vital to the show’s success, the access to the actors and show executives has also fueled the cult-like following. ABC markets “Scandal” as Thursday’s “most-talked-about-show on Twitter.” This is accurate advertising. “Scandal” averages 350,000 tweets per episode and hashtags #AskScandal, #Scandal and #Gladiators trend every week. Viewers use social media to live-tweet the show and also participate in “ask Scandal,” a live question-and-answer session with the show’s stars, hairstylists, makeup artists, directors, writers and producers.

More than 2.07 million “Scandal”-related tweets have been sent this season and some, including ABC Entertainment Group’s executive vice president Marla Provenci, estimate this can change how Nielsen scores ratings in the future. “While the tools don’t currently exist to 100 percent correlate social media activity to ratings, our first major social media push when the President was shot led to the first major uptick in the demo ratings,” Provenci told Yahoo.

That’s an underestimate of social media’s influence. Oprah Winfrey learned about “Scandal” through Twitter and then featured the drama on “Oprah’s Next Chapter.” Rhimes credits the national exposure to the community engagement Twitter provides. “Fans feel a certain ownership of the show,” Rhimes told Yahoo. “If you feel like you can get on Twitter and talk about it while it’s airing, it makes them feel like they’re a part of things. The more they feel they’re a part of things, the more invested they’re going to be in the show and that’s important.”

Black women love “Scandal.” They absorb it with fervor and attempt to reel in as many friends and relatives as possible. This newfound audience demographic has led to the creation of other network dramas starring people of color. CBS offered gigs to Megalyn Echikunwoke, Cedric Sanders and Derek Luke, NBC tapped Meagan Good in “Deception” and NBC is also developing a pilot starring Lance Gross as a secret service agent. I’ve dubbed this the “Scandal” effect. “Scandal” has effectively diversified primetime by showing network executives the impact and influence of black audiences. Let’s hope this lasts long after Olivia Pope and Associates close their doors.

- Evette Brown

Mar
06/13
The “TV Everywhere” Strategy is Struggling
Last Updated on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 04:15
Written by ModernMediaMix
Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

Facing the challenges from new media, traditional cable television operators in the United States have reached a consensus to promote the “TV Everywhere” strategy.

What is the TV Everywhere (TVE) strategy? In short, it’s an attempt to make broadcast and cable programming available online, on-demand and free with a cable subscription. All you need to do is to verify, or authenticate, your cable TV subscription with a username and password, and have a broadband subscription to go with it. Cable operators Comcast and Time-Warner launched this strategy in 2009, and since then Satellite TV operators have basically launched their own TVE deployment.

blog5

However, after three years, the TVE strategy still has a far way to go to achieve its target goals, and it seems to have had little effect on changing the pattern of online media consumption. And online media websites such as Netflix, Hulu, iTunes, and Amazon Prime are continuing to flourish, with their rapidly increasing audience and market share, their expanding coverage from national to global, and more and more content from television providers.

Though various cable TV operators have invested a lot of money in the TVE strategy, the consumers are still not buying it, make the widely promoted strategy into an embarrassing situation.

Why has the TVE strategy achieved little success in the U.S? To analyze its failure, first we might have a look at the business mode of the traditional TV industry. The TV industry in U.S has several significant features. Cable service average revenue per user is very high, generally about $100. Operators are also the distributors of television content, and they need to pay a huge amount of money for the content licensing fees. TV content providers and TV operators form a monopoly relationship of producing and marketing, which makes them further form an alliance to share the interests.

Given this, it is not difficult to understand the biggest reason why the TVE strategy is struggling—content providers still have a monopoly on the high-quality content of the video industry. For instance, although the largest online media operator Netflix has already surpassed the largest cable operator Comcast in the number of users, and even started its own worldwide expansion, its income, however, still cannot compete with that of Comcast.

Traditional TV still controls the largest part of the revenue of the TV industry. This makes the traditional TV operators afraid of weakening their own traditional TV business, as well as fearing the new video media business cannot be profitable when lunching the TVE strategy. Therefore, the operators are hesitate to put some high-quality content into TVE which may hurt their traditional TV business, and the TVE content is becoming just a part of TV content, which greatly reduce the attraction to the TVE users. In fact, the TVE users are limited by these operators, they cannot freely get the content from the Internet.

blog6

With the development of the online media, there is a discrepancy between the interests of the TV content providers and the traditional TV operators. TV content providers found that, via the Internet, they can provide their own content directly to users, such as ESPN and HBO, both have launched their own online media business. Some new media operators such as Netflix, iTunes, Amazon Prime and so on, offer various platforms and new distribution channels, TV content providers are constantly reaching a variety of content licensing agreements with these new media operators. And, in accordance with the agreement between the TV content providers and traditional TV operators, the TV content providers will never allow the traditional operators put the contents directly into TVE for free if these contents have not been licensed by them. Therefore, traditional operators and content providers are often engaged in lawsuits.

Finally, when TV operators are promoting the TVE strategy, they need to get new license agreements for these online content from the providers, some may have to pay for additional license fees.

However, the commercial interest mode of the TVE strategy is still uncertain, traditional operators cannot quickly get new revenue sources through TVE, yet they have to pay for the huge construction costs of the TVE online platform and the other additional content fees, which all make it more difficult for the operators to advance the TVE strategy.

- Xuan Li

Tags: ,   |  Posted under Entertainment, Television  |  Comments  No Comments
Aug
04/11
The Woes of Programming Control
Last Updated on Sunday, 4 November 2012 10:26
Written by lyoung87
Thursday, August 4th, 2011

As a summer intern for a major network affiliate in a top market, I learned a great deal about control over television’s content. More specifically, control for a television station that is owned and operated by the network (O&O) compared to that of a station that is affiliated, but owned by a separate media company.

Like many television viewers, I used to think that all of the shows airing on television were dictated by the network. After beginning my major in college, I quickly learned that this notion was inaccurate. My assignments at my internship helped better my understanding of this relationship over content.
During my orientation, I learned that my station initially began as an affiliate of another major network. As this affiliate, the network supplied my station with 22 hours of programming. The station was only required to fill the programming gap for two hours. As the years progressed, my station was acquired by another parent company, causing a switch from being one network’s affiliate to being another major network’s affiliate. With this switch also came more control over the station’s content. Instead of supplying the affiliate with 22 hours of programming, the network only provides 2 hours of daily programming. These two hours are during the primetime day part. Supplying and controlling the primetime programming of true affiliates are functions granted to the network.

TV stations like mine that are not true affiliates have more control over the content that they display. They, too, receive content from the network. However, unlike my station, these stations have more autonomy in terms of the length and times of that the content is aired. For instance,  a Dallas professional sports team brought home a historic championship this past summer.  The weeks prior to the major win allowed many businesses to capitalize on the excitement surrounding the championship. These businesses included stores, private vendors, and the Dallas network affiliate that aired the sports game.  Unlike many of this affiliate’s sister stations across the country, this affiliate decided to not air the pre- and post-game shows supplied by the network. Instead, this affiliate used its local news as pre- and post-game specials.

By opting to do this, this affiliate was not only controlling its content, but also its revenue. This is because when a network supplies the content, the majority of the money generated from that content’s commercial sales goes back to the network. In terms of the pre- and post-game shows, this independently owned and operated station’s local shows were sponsored by local businesses. Making a small decision to create its own thirty-minute pre- and post-game shows enabled this local affiliate to capitalize on the ratings of the championship. As an affiliate with more control, rather than an O&O, the station was able to generate substantial revenue from its local market.

-LaCreanna Young