Thursday Jun 20

Author Archive

Aug
04/11
The Woes of Programming Control
Last Updated on Sunday, 4 November 2012 10:26
Written by lyoung87
Thursday, August 4th, 2011

As a summer intern for a major network affiliate in a top market, I learned a great deal about control over television’s content. More specifically, control for a television station that is owned and operated by the network (O&O) compared to that of a station that is affiliated, but owned by a separate media company.

Like many television viewers, I used to think that all of the shows airing on television were dictated by the network. After beginning my major in college, I quickly learned that this notion was inaccurate. My assignments at my internship helped better my understanding of this relationship over content.
During my orientation, I learned that my station initially began as an affiliate of another major network. As this affiliate, the network supplied my station with 22 hours of programming. The station was only required to fill the programming gap for two hours. As the years progressed, my station was acquired by another parent company, causing a switch from being one network’s affiliate to being another major network’s affiliate. With this switch also came more control over the station’s content. Instead of supplying the affiliate with 22 hours of programming, the network only provides 2 hours of daily programming. These two hours are during the primetime day part. Supplying and controlling the primetime programming of true affiliates are functions granted to the network.

TV stations like mine that are not true affiliates have more control over the content that they display. They, too, receive content from the network. However, unlike my station, these stations have more autonomy in terms of the length and times of that the content is aired. For instance,  a Dallas professional sports team brought home a historic championship this past summer.  The weeks prior to the major win allowed many businesses to capitalize on the excitement surrounding the championship. These businesses included stores, private vendors, and the Dallas network affiliate that aired the sports game.  Unlike many of this affiliate’s sister stations across the country, this affiliate decided to not air the pre- and post-game shows supplied by the network. Instead, this affiliate used its local news as pre- and post-game specials.

By opting to do this, this affiliate was not only controlling its content, but also its revenue. This is because when a network supplies the content, the majority of the money generated from that content’s commercial sales goes back to the network. In terms of the pre- and post-game shows, this independently owned and operated station’s local shows were sponsored by local businesses. Making a small decision to create its own thirty-minute pre- and post-game shows enabled this local affiliate to capitalize on the ratings of the championship. As an affiliate with more control, rather than an O&O, the station was able to generate substantial revenue from its local market.

-LaCreanna Young

Jul
29/11
TV is Downsizing Too!
Last Updated on Sunday, 4 November 2012 10:27
Written by lyoung87
Friday, July 29th, 2011

As an intern at a television network affiliate in the 5th largest media market (Dallas, TX), I am learning so much about the world of media. In addition to being exposed to advertising sales, programming, and media research (i.e. Nielsen ratings,  audience behaviors, etc), I am also exposed to the other activities that occur in TV stations. The presence of those activities, and the lack there of, is what motivated me to address a very important media issue. That media issue is downsizing.

From my observations, downsizing at this affiliate is sparked by two major factors. One being the advancements in technology. The other is the economy. Since the beginning of my internship, I have witnessed the devastating state of the economy take its toll on the medium of TV. Like many companies, my station’s response to the economy was to cut and double jobs. For instance, there are affiliate employees that handle day–to-day tasks for other affiliates across the country. An example of this is the voice-overs for promos created by the station. Prior to working with the Creative Director, I always thought that voice-overs were done internally by an employee of that particular station. The Creative Director informed me that in order to save the network money, voice-overs for all of the network’s affiliates are done by one man in Florida. Since the technology is so advanced , media files can be sent  electronically in a matter of seconds. As a result, the Dallas affiliate emails the script to Florida and waits for the audio file to be returned.  Once it is received, a member of the Creative team edits it into the promo. The above is an example of a downsizing that may seem harmless. However, recently, my affiliate’s network has implemented a new system for loading the content that is to be aired.

About two weeks ago, the network decided to terminate the positions of individuals in charge of “feeding” the transmitters that air not only network content, but local content as well. This means that my station and its sister stations across the country no longer have someone on site to control the loading of TV programs and commercials. Instead, the network decided to have one man in charge of loading the transmitters of its affiliate stations.  From the network’s perspective, enabling one location to control the content for all of the affiliates is a tremendous money saver. However, this decision makes it extremely difficult for affiliates to solve any on-air issues. . The is one dramatic example of downsizing because it forced every affiliate to lay-off many individuals in their Operations department.

Prior to my internship, I was aware of the fact that technology allowed robotic cameras to replace positions such as camera operators and technical directors. Unfortunately, I was not expecting downsizing to ever impact the Operations department.  Overall, my internship has taught me that downsizing is an issue for all companies-television stations included.

-LaCreanna Young

Tags:   |  Posted under Entertainment, Media Sectors, Television  |  Comments  No Comments